Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 0:51:16 GMT -5
The National Anti-Corruption System (SNA) was not authorized to have a General Directorate of Social Communication , nor a technological development directorate, despite the fact that it has the obligation to develop a digital platform . According to the Coordinating Committee made up of various institutions such as the PGR , the Judicial Council and the Citizen Participation Committee , the SNA lacks the communication direction because the institutions that make up the new system have a similar area. Without these directions, the National Anti-Corruption System is left without a way to publicize its work and the processes of each of the strategies it adopts, likewise it will not have a structure to design the dissemination of the national anti-corruption strategy.
In this way, the SNA will have no way of deciding the times in which it issues communication of its work to society. If the System detects any act of corruption in the institutions that make up the Coordinating Committee, it will not be able to make it known, because those same institutions will determine the way in which they will make the work known. According to the Draft of the Administrative Structure and Organization of the Executive Secretariat of the SNA, the Iceland Mobile Number List organization requested two units: Risk and Public Policy, and Technological Services and Digital Platform, as well as eight general directorates: Administration; of Legal Affairs; of Social Communication; Design, Planning and Evaluation of Public Policies; of Technological Infrastructure; Monitoring and Risk Analysis; Systems and Operations, and Interinstitutional Linkage. The Coordinating Committee approved two units, but only three general directorates: Administration, Legal Affairs and Interinstitutional Liaison, according to the DOF publication, of the agreement that shapes the structure of the National Anti-Corruption System.
This is how the SNA will lack communication and that is why it is said to have gone silent. The rejection of the creation of these general directorates was by the Governing Body of the SNA.f this place is exploited, the consequences could be very serious due to the environmental risks it entails. The extraction of gas and oil from the Arctic is only profitable when the barrel of crude oil is at a level close to 85 dollars, very far from the 45-50 dollars at which it is installed. According to ABC, many see the Arctic as the scene of a new Cold War in which commercial, energy, political and environmental interests will mix. It will be a challenge to economically exploit this place and Russia, Canada, the USA, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark have territorial rights over its waters. Russia is the main actor with half of the coast facing the Arctic in its territory and with four million people living there.
In this way, the SNA will have no way of deciding the times in which it issues communication of its work to society. If the System detects any act of corruption in the institutions that make up the Coordinating Committee, it will not be able to make it known, because those same institutions will determine the way in which they will make the work known. According to the Draft of the Administrative Structure and Organization of the Executive Secretariat of the SNA, the Iceland Mobile Number List organization requested two units: Risk and Public Policy, and Technological Services and Digital Platform, as well as eight general directorates: Administration; of Legal Affairs; of Social Communication; Design, Planning and Evaluation of Public Policies; of Technological Infrastructure; Monitoring and Risk Analysis; Systems and Operations, and Interinstitutional Linkage. The Coordinating Committee approved two units, but only three general directorates: Administration, Legal Affairs and Interinstitutional Liaison, according to the DOF publication, of the agreement that shapes the structure of the National Anti-Corruption System.
This is how the SNA will lack communication and that is why it is said to have gone silent. The rejection of the creation of these general directorates was by the Governing Body of the SNA.f this place is exploited, the consequences could be very serious due to the environmental risks it entails. The extraction of gas and oil from the Arctic is only profitable when the barrel of crude oil is at a level close to 85 dollars, very far from the 45-50 dollars at which it is installed. According to ABC, many see the Arctic as the scene of a new Cold War in which commercial, energy, political and environmental interests will mix. It will be a challenge to economically exploit this place and Russia, Canada, the USA, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark have territorial rights over its waters. Russia is the main actor with half of the coast facing the Arctic in its territory and with four million people living there.